Article Analysis - Gun Control :: Constituton Bill Rights Right To Bear Arms

Article Analysis - Gun ControlThe obligate, pickings Aim at Gun Control by Daniel D. Polsby and Dennis Brennen was written October 30, 1995 for the Heartland executive director Summary. The article deals with current grease-gun control issues, and uses both statistical information, and unrestrained ideology to convince you of the authors opinion. The article is broken down into five replace topics, that are each supported by statistical information. In the graduation sub topic the main heading claims, There is no affinity between the number of in camera owned guns and the amount of violent execration in the United States. It is then supported with the statistics that gun ownership has increase by forty-five percent, and the homicide rate fell by ten percent. The article also quotes various studies taken from criminologists, such as Gary Kleck and E. Britt Patterson. The authors draw to begin their argument with factual information. They then use that information to puzzle out their emotional argument. This can be seen in each of the sub topics. The counterbalance three topics, There is no relationship between the number of privately owned guns and the amount of violent crimes in the United States, There is no relationship between gun control laws and violent crime, and Data from the urban center of Chicago cast further doubt on the effectiveness of gun control laws, use studies and statistics to prove their point. The last two sub topics, wherefore do gun control laws fail? and What do we do astir(predicate) crime and violence?, offer the authors emotional argument. This is the section of the article where the accepted opinion of the two authors is seen. They sum up their beliefs, with what they consider to be a better solution to improving society without gun control. They suggest that by educating the public on proper gun safety and handling, fewer pot would be hurt. It is also their belief that by making guns more reachable to responsible c itizens, criminals would be less likely to commit acts of violence. They speculate that an build up society would be able to prevent criminals from perpetrating a crime forward it is even committed.