.

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Cronica de Una Muerte Anunciado

Society should not be blamed for the unsociable behavior of some case-by-cases. Every society is do up of individuals with opposite values, preferences, goals and personalities. It is at that placefore not surprising to learn that some people aspect that society should be blamed for any antisocial behaviour the individual might display. Before considering both sides of this issue we will define what is meant by the term antisocial behaviour. Behaviour that goes against what is considered acceptable by the norms opf society is utter to be antisocial.Therefore, in most modern societies, murder, drug-abuse, violence and rape be among the behaviours that atomic number 18 antisocial. Should the society really be held accountable for the misconduct of its citizens? rough know that it is unjust to blame the society because, as a leave office moral agent, the individual is responsible for his/her own decisions and actions. For instance in Cronica de una muerte anunciada by Gabri el Garcia Marquez, the Vicario brothers kill Santiago Nasar to avenge the familys honour.It is a death that is foretold because they have already made their intentions known to most people i the society. As a result, there are those who blame the society for not having done anything to block the murder. In fact, many citizens feel guilty for having remained silent over the matter. However, who made the decision to comit this antisocial act? Who actually committed it? The truth is, the Vicario brothers are the ones who made this decision and committed the act. So should the society be held accountable?One might consider the events leading up to the murder and study that Angela, her parents, and her friends were all equally accountable. Even though she was not in beloved with Bayardo, her parents were taken in by his wealth. Moreover, her mother assured her el amor se aprende. Her friends too, discouraged her from any thought of revealing that she was not a virgin. They in any ca se assured her that her husband would not be aware of her state, and they encouraged her to cheat him Lo unico que creen es lo que vean en la sabana, le dijeron. All these factors led to her world returned to her parents in a state of disgrace, thus prompting her brothers to seek stunned and kill Santiago Nasar. In addition to this, the societal traditions that led the brothers to feel the need to avenge the familys honour could be blamed for the fateful events. As we have seen, even though the Vicario brothers must bear the responsibility for their actions, there is overwhelming evidence that the society, through its silence, its traditions, its deceit, and its greed, is to be blamed for the antisocial behaviour of Angelas brothers.

No comments:

Post a Comment