Example Answers For Questions On Evidence Based Practice Nursing Essay

Example Answers For Questions On Evidence erect Practice nursing EssayIntroductionIn this assignment I shall discuss the concepts of Evidence ground Practice (EBP), and briefly outline its impressiveness to my master key normal. I shall select a relevant face of my intrust session in relation to my professional discipline. I will provide a rationale for selecting my aspect of professional discipline, which will be within the context of use of (EBP). I will discuss the extent to which my selected aspect of professional hold is informed by various types of evidence. In relation my chosen aspect of professional practice, I shall then key out factors that whitethorn facilitate and block off the implementation of (EBP).Q1Evidence base practice (EBP) is to demonstrate the surpass practice, which has been supported, with a clear rationale to back it up. Whilst using (EBP), this withal accognitions the patient of/clients best interest. (EBP) is the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions around the carry off of individual patient/clients (Sackett et al, 1996).In this definition Sackett facilitates an understanding between (EBP) and decisions we make in everyday practice. This demonstrates the strong friendship between both aspects. here, Sackett emphasises the importance of decisions we make as healthc atomic act 18 professionals, and how clear they should be stated. This shows that decisions ar well thought-out, which demonstrates that the use of evidence is used sanely and cargonfully, which means that any cargon or support we deliver must(prenominal) be evidence establish. It shows that Sackett understands that if care or support we provide has a rationale, then this en equal to(p)-bodieds us to deliver it with a meaningful purpose.According to the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) we as healthcare professionals must deliver care on the best evidence or best practice (2008). The code of beam clearly states that any advice we give must be evidence based. If we beetle off to adhere to the code, then this whitethorn result in disciplinary reach by the (NMC) (2008).As healthcare professionals I feel any care we deliver should pretend a rational to justify anything we carry out. I believe that as healthcare professionals we are expected to understand wherefore we are caring for patient/clients, whereby a rationale is provided for the care that we provide. (EBP) fosters us as healthcare professionals keep updated with policies and procedures (ref). It is funda psychogenic that we keep our skills and knowledge current, which en competents us to provide effective care.(EBP) in its earlier days of evidence based medicinal drug, which provides a suit fitting way in producing efficient clinical decisions, avoiding routinely work practice, which increases clinical performance (Evidence Based Medicine Working chemical group 1992, Davidoff et al ,1995). In the above state ment it demonstrates that (EBP) contri exceptes to signifi outhouset clinical decisions, which may afterward developIt is important that we adhere to policies and procedures for the best practice available, which may prevent us from making any errors. As practitioners we are accountable for our actions. Justifying what we do is vital, which must pee a rationale behind it. visitation to adhere to (NMC) may result in professional misconduct (2008).Q2Here I shall formulate the unbelief according the (PICO) method, which is population, intervention, comparison intervention, and outcome. This was devised by Sackett et al, which is a useful method in order to make questions more businesslike (1997).My selected aspect of professional practice is the Treatment of Depression and its Effectiveness in Adults with Cancer.I personally feel at that place is a high preponderance of belief in whoremastercer patients. In my experience, I shed found that there are many cancer patients, whic h may be torment from imprint. According to Barraclough (1994) states that falloff is the around common psychiatric illness in patients with terminal cancer. The high prevalence of drop-off in cancer patient has influenced me carry out my own enquiry, which will effectively enhance my knowledge. Personally, I feel that by ontogeny my knowledge on my chosen proposition will help enable me to have a greater understanding, t in my early practice.Hinton (1963) found that 24% of patients dying in an tart hospital were depressed. It has been found by Casey that patients suffering with depression may be assessed by asking them if they have symptoms such as loss of sport in activities, feelings of guilt and worthlessness, or thoughts of self harm, which may help in recognizing a diagnosis in depression (1994).Q3The objective of a soft enquiry is to describe, explore, and give explanation to the phenomenon what is being studied (Marshall Rossman, 2006. (international Morse code Richards 2002) established that there many techniques used in the collection of data involved in the production of a qualitative study, but the commonly used are observing and interviewing partakers. A meta-analysis is within a qualitative study, whereby the findings of qualitative are carefully examined, the methods and theories from different studies, to form an overview or conclusive slipway of view about phenomena Thorne et al (2004).In my experience I have found that many patients whom have cancer have been low in mood, but often go left untreated. Maguire found that up to 80% of affable and psychiatric morbidity, which develops in cancer patients often goes unrecognised and untreated (1985).It speaks about how patients are non-compliant in discussing symptoms unreservedly with nursing and medical examination staff. It mentions that in the join Kingdom (U.K) clinical nurse specialists play an important role in assessing the symptoms and providing advice to cancer patient with super real and metastatic cancer ( elderly et al,1999).This qualitative study was purposely carried to deter how clinical nurse specialist manage, assess, and grasp depression in such patients, in both hospital and confederacy settings. Atkin et al (1993) found that 43.4% of nurses reported that early recognition of, signs of anxiety and depression was part of their role. It shows the difficulty nurses are faced with in convincing medical staff to follow up assessment or prescribe antidepressant medication.I shall now critique the study. Firstly, none of the nurses had any form of mental health training. Therefore, I feel their lack of knowledge may have falsified the findings of the study. Lastly, the demographic area may have been expanded further afield, which subsequently makes the findings minimalistic.The view proposed by Long (1995, p94) that the most problematic characteristic of the hierarchy of evidence model, is that it completely lacks recognition of qualita tive study methods. According to Sackett et al (1996) a qualitative is in the rank of research evidence at the base. Here, it shows that a qualitative study has inadequate capability, whereby it lacks randomization, it also has scarce onwards and after studies.However, it does give emphasis to the fact that open ended question were asked in a qualitative study, which demonstrates its feasibility. An open ended question can have many answers, whereby it can be answered in many ways than one. If in depth answers are obtained, then this may enable the researchers to trance a greater insight of the situation.Nevertheless, it has been discovered that identifying the findings in a qualitative study can be complex, this may due the style of reports, or they may be perceived wrongly (Sandelowski Barroso 2004).Systematic reviews were first delimit as concise of the best available evidence that address sharp defined clinical questions (Murlow et al 1997). Here, it states that a dogmatic review involves meeting place quality information, which is then analysed, whereby it is then summarised. A doctrinal review is a vital source of evidence-informed policy and practice movement, which connects research in decision-making (Chalmers, 2003).Secondly, this dogmatic review provides us with evidence on cancer patients receiving interventions such as drug therapy, and their efficacy. In this systematic review it found that depression is the most common in cancer patients, which often goes undiscovered and untreated (Lloyd-Williams, (2000) Bailey et al,(2005).It also shows that cancer patients survival rate may be decline if their repellent response is impaired. (Andersen et al, 1998 cuttingport and Nemeroff, 1998 Reiche et al, 2004) and poorer survival (Buccheri, 1998 Faller et al, 1999 Watson et al, 1999 Faller and Bulzebruck 2002 Herjl et al, 2003 Goodwin et al, 2004). It is know that in prior systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the effectiveness of interventio ns for cancer patients whom are suffering from depression have been unsuccessful in differentiating between depression/depressive symptoms.Dale and Williams (2005) refers to the findings from this review, which demonstrate that there pocket-sized trial data on the effectiveness of antidepressants, which are prescribed to adulterate major depression and depressive symptoms in those suffering with cancer.Nevertheless, previous reviews which have failed to identify the dissimilarity between both depression and depressive symptoms. It shows little data from clinical trials, which demonstrate releasing interventions, which may effective in reducing depression in cancer patients.A number of small-scale trials showed that psychotherapeutic interventions, more so Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), which may be effective in treating cancer patient whom have depressive symptoms.In conclusion, this review shows that there is a hard-pressed need for a more rigorous process in the examinati on of the effectiveness and consequences regarding approaches towards in managing depression in cancer patients, and providing them with suppress healthcare services.In respect to the hierarchy of evidence chart Sackett (1996) states that systematic reviews are at the peak of the chart, which demonstrates this, a strong piece of evidence. The results of a systematic reviews are produced in such a way, whereby a unadulterated examination of evidence is processed (Murlow,1987 Cook et al.,1998). Sackett and Straus (1998) found that systematic reviews of (RCTs) are ranked as the best evidence in making clinical decisions in relation to a patients care.Within this study a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCT) of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic implementation for cancer patients with depression/depressive symptoms. This study had a specific criterion for the selection of (RCTs) of the pharmacological medicine and psychotherapeutic interventions. Partakers were ei ther adult cancer patients with depression, or depressive symptoms receiving interventions such as pharmacology and psychotherapeutic.This source of evidence fits into the hierarchy of evidence at the apex of the chart. It is cognize that a singular RCT or Several RCTs are well thought-out as the uppermost aim of evidence, and anything below this is classed as a lower level of evidence, which may be classed as an inadequate source of information (Ellis 2000, Lake 2006, Morse 2006b, Rolfe Gardner 2006). Evidence shows that (RCTs) are considered highly effective sources of information (Muir Gray, 1997Mulrow Oxman, 1997 Sackett et al.,1997).It would be highly unethical to use these findings as a prejudice against patients with cancer who manage receive treatment for depression and depressive symptoms, because of the limited data on effectiveness.However, tralatitious or unsystematic reviews can be apparent and suitable to attain, which can also be deceptive at times, above all th ey are scientific Murlow(1987).None of these studies make mention of persons centred planning (PCP), which is slightly concerning. Professionals may have four ways in which they can contribute towards (PCP) introducing, contributing, safeguarding, and implementing/ consolidation (PCP) (Kilbane and Sanderson ,2004).Q4.Although, there may be an accumulating body of knowledge about the efficacy of immeasurable nursing practises, which leaves gap between what is in fact cognize and what is actually practised (Grol and Grimshaw, 2003).People whom have been in the profession for a long time may not approve or paying attention to adhere to the implementation of (EBP). This may be due to a number of reasons such as culture, age, learning ability, or even attitudes towards changes within an organisation.It is known that there may be barriers which may cause complications in applying (EBP) in nursing practise, this has been established in extensive literature reports (Estabrooks et al 2004) . If a nurses workload is too big, then this may influence their ability to conciliate to changes in practise.A significant source of implementing (EBP) is student nurses or newly do nurse. I have found that student nurses and newly qualified nurses are an important source in the utilisation of (EBP). If for example they have carried out research at university for an assignment, then they may be able to apply and demonstrate this in practise, and also influence fellow colleagues. consequenceIn writing this assignment I have found depression in cancer patients is significantly high. I am now able to say that on the completion of this I am now able to acknowledge the complexities of depression in cancer patient. This will enhance my future practice as a nurse, which will enable me to apply the knowledge I have gained from this assignment into practise. I am now able understand the importance of (EBP), and its relation to my future practise. This has helped assist me in developing m y academic skills. On the completion of this assignment I have developed my analysis skills immensely, which will help assist me in my future practise.ReferencesAtkin K., Lunt N., Parker G. Hirst M. (1993) Nurses debate ANational Census of Practice Nurses. Social Policy investigateUnit, University of York, York.Barraclough J, (1994), Cancer and emotion. Chichester UKWileyCasey P. Depression in the dying- disorder or distress. Progr Palliat Care 1994 2 1-3.Davidoff F, Haynes B, Sackett D Smith R, (1993) Evidence-based medicine a new journal to help doctors identify the information they need. British Medical ledger 310, 1085-1085.Ellis J (2000) sacramental manduction the evidence clinical practice benchmarking to improve continuously the quality of care. journal of Advanced Nursing 32, 215-225. Preston, LancashireEstabrooks CA, Winther C, Derkson L. Mapping he feild a bibliometric analysis of the research utilization literature in nursing. Nurs Res 2004 53293-303EVANS D, journal of clinical Nursing 2003 12 77-84, Hierarchy of evidence a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventionsEvidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence based medicine a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268,2420-2425.Gray R, Parr A, Plummer S, Sanford T, Ritter S, Mundtleach B, Goldberg D, Gournay K. A national survey of practice involvement in mental health interventions. J Adv Nurs 1999 30 901-906Grol, R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice effective implementation of change in patients care. Lancet 20033621225-30Hinton J, The physical and mental distress of dying. Q J Med (1963) 32 1-21Kilbane J Sanderson H (2004) What and howunderstanding professional involvement in person centred planning styles and approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities.Long, A.F.(1995) health services research a radical approach to cross the research and development divide, in Baker, M, Kirk, S(ed.) Reasearch and development for the NHS, e vidence, evaluation and effectiveness. Oxford pp. 94MANTZOUKAS S (2008) Journal of Clinical Nursing 17, 214-223 London, A review of evidence-based practice, nursing research and reprimandlevelling the hierarchyMaguire P. Improving the detection of psychiatric problems in cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 1985 20 819-23Morse JM, Richards L. READ ME FIRST for a users guide to Qualitative Methods. k Oaks Sage, 2002.Morse MJ (2006b) the politics of evidence. Qualitative wellness look 16, 395-404. Canada.Muir Gray J.A. (1997) Evidence-Based Healthcare. Churchill Livingstone, New York.Murlow CD, Cook DJ and Davidoff F (1997) Systematic inspections. Critical links in the great chain of evidence. Annals of Internal Medicine 126(5)389-91Mulrow C.D. Oxman A.D. (1997) Cochrane Collaboration vade mecum (database on disk and CDROM). The Cochrane Library, The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, Updated Software.NMC REF 2008Rolfe G Gardner L (2006) Towards a geology of evidence-basedpractice a discu ssion paper. International Journal of NursingStudies 43, 903-913. Swansea,Sackett D.L., Richardson W.S., Rosenberg W. Haynes R.B.(1997) Evidence Based Medicine How to Practice and Teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone, New York.Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB, (1997) Evidence based medicine how to practice and teach EBM, London Churchill LivingstoneSackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Muir GrayJ.A, Haynes R.B and Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine. What it is and what isnt,British Medical Journal 31271-2Sackett DL, Straus S, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W and Haynes RB (2000) Evidence-Based Medicine how to practice and teach EBM (2e). Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghSandelowski M, Barroso J conclusion the findings in qualitative studies. J Nurs Scholarsh 2002, 34213-219. Open AccessSilva, Carlos Nunes (2008). Review Catherine Marshall Gretchen B. Rossman (2006). Designing Qualitative Research 20 paragraphs. assembly Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 13, Are you Ipad Lover If not Become oneness http//www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fon.fb.me%2FdUg8mah=80efbAre you Ipad Lover If not Become One http//www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fon.fb.me%2FdUg8mah=80efbS Williams1 and J Dale1 Br J Cancer. 2006 Coventry Cancer Research UKThorne S, Jensen L, Kearney MH, Noblit G, Sandelowski M. Qualitative meta-synthesis reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda .Qual Health Res 2004141342-65