Freuds Theory of Unconscious in Inter Group Relations

Freuds Theory of Unconscious in Inter theme RelationsFreuds contributions to repose classify dealingFreuds theories on unconscious mind(p)ness provided an important perspective that was relevant to the study of bury ag company relations. Freud believed that groups were composed of the unconscious life of each particle. He thought a group couldnt be understood without exploring the unconscious aspects of the respective(prenominal) member. He also was of the opinion that the separate couldnt be separated from the group. In order to understand the mind, Freud believed that attention had to be paid to how the mind of an person interacts with others (Caper 1999). The basis of Freuds psychoanalytic hypothesis is that all behaviour is twain instinctual and biological. Freuds psychoanalytic theory is composed of the ego which works to pass a balance between the id and the superego. The superego would be classified as the demands our rescript places on the psyche for accept able behaviour, and the id comprises instincts, much(prenominal) as sex and trespass (Schultz Schultz 2005). This aspect of Freuds theory plays an important role in inter group relations. It addresses the unconscious nature of each mortal in a group environment, as well as the unconscious nature of the undefiled group (Wrogemann 2003).Unconscious influences at work in inter group relations are experienced in different ways. One use is when a group is experiencing a failure and in order to comfort their ego they engage in defence mechanisms by blaming other groups for their failure. They suppose outdoors of themselves for excuses as to why their effort failed, instead of realizing as Freud did, that the anguish each member experienced was cause by low self-assertion and insecurities (Bodenhausen, Mussweiler, Gabriel, Moreno 2001 Wrogemann 2003). Freuds theory of the unconscious and ego protection sheds light on how to improve inter group relations and increase success. If a group stopped deflecting from their give birth shortcomings by looking outside(a) of their own organization they could more effectively correct their problems. If they would attempt to find the roots of their own behaviour they could get to the source of their failure. They would find it didnt come from an outside group, but from within themselves (Wrogemann 2003). Freuds theories, in part, are the basis for little terror Management Theory (TMT), which deals with managing thoughts of death and is important to inter group relations (Navarette, Kirkpatrick, Kurzban Fessler 2004).Looking inwardly is a concept that originated with Freud. McCormick and White (2000) reported that this self-analyzing order was an important aspect of psychoanalytic theory. Other scientists picked up on it and apply it to the study of groups (as cited in Wrogemann 2003). Cilliers and Koortzen (1998) report that Freuds theories of psychodynamics contributed to the concept that groups micturate a li fe of their own. Not only does a group have a collective consciousness, it also is composed of the collective unconscious nuances of each individual (as cited in Wrogemann 2003). Each member of a group brings to it their own unconscious desires and unmet needs. Their inner conflicts and tensions are played out in the group setting, such as at work. In the work environment, as each person unconsciously attempts to solve their issues, they are met with frustration and disappointment. The work environment cannot obtain those needs leading the individual to fuck off aggressive and exhibit other negative behaviours. The end result is that of strained relationships with others. As with other groups experiencing failure, workers have a tendency to blame their frustrations on someone else. They blame others for their miss of success or their disappointment while at the same duration attempting to find security in those very relationships (Wrogemann 2003).Freuds theory of fixing was imp ortant to understanding inter group relations.Freud believed that depersonalization took place in the group causing a shift in inter group relations. The shift occurred when the individual member of a group loses his individuality and those alone(predicate) qualities that set him apart from others. The process is an unconscious one where the group member takes on the role of child and the leader that of the parent. The result is a lawsuit of dependence on the leader that leads to thoughts that the group is not composed of individuals (Freud 1921). The lines become blurred. Bion (1961) had a more positive outlook on the dynamics of inter group relations. He claimed that when individuals came together in a group that they vacate their individuality to the leader and group in order to experience wholeness, oneness, and security. In order for the group to continue to exist it takes on something bigger that is outside of themselves.Freuds contributions to the study of inter group rela tions was significant. By nidus on the unconscious he brought attention to the elements of group dynamics that convoluted unmet needs, unfulfilled desires, and other drives that are hidden, yet influencing factors in group interaction. His theory of the id, ego, and superego help to explain what happens in the mind of the individual and then collectively when part of a group. On his views regarding the importance of the individual in the scene of a group, Freud wroteonly rarely and under certain exceptional conditions is individualpsychology in a position to disregard the relations of this individualto others. In the individuals mental life someone else is invariablyinvolved, as a model, as an object, as a helper or as an opposition(quoted in Caper 1999, pg. 1).Some of Freuds theories have not been support by subsequent testing by others, but a round of them have been shown to be valid. Freuds theories on the unconscious and its relation to a persons behaviour, thoughts, and e motions were accurate. Research that was conducted long after the Freud era cease demonstrated that his theory on the role of the unconscious was more all-encompassing than anyone thought possible. Freud had no idea just how far-reaching his theory on the unconscious was (Schultz Schultz 2005). Research into inter group relations is based partly on the contributions of Sigmund Freud and the benefits derived are substantial.ReferencesBion, W. 1961, Experience in Groups. New York, Basic Books.Bodenhausen, G., Mussweiler, T., Gabriel, S. Moreno, K. 2001, Affective InfluencesOn Stereotyping and Intergroup Relations. In Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition, ed. J.P. Forgas, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ,pp. 319-338.Caper, R. 1999, Group Psychology and the psychoanalytical Group, Online,International Psychoanalytic Organization, pg. 1. Available fromhttp//eseries.ipa.org.uk/prev/CIRC/Caper-m1.htm 3 January 2006.Freud, S. 1921, Group Psychology and the synopsis of t he Ego, London,International Psychological Press.Navarette, C. , Kirkpatrick, L., Kurzban, R. Fessler, D. 2004, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 370-397.Schultz, D. Schultz, S. 2004, A account statement of Modern Psychology (8th ed.). Belmont,CA, Thompson/Wadsworth.Wrogemann, G. 2003, Intergroup Relations in Organisations, 6th Annual group discussion of The Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology, Available fromhttp//www.siopsa.org.za, 3 January 2006.